Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2014-01-10

linux-next: manual merge of the sh tree with the tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-10 01:55:55
Also in: linux-next, linux-sh, lkml

Hi all,

On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 09:47:24 +0900 Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 11:11:03PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
quoted
The request to merge the sh code came through Simon with claimed
agreement from SH maintainers to do so -- I didn't verify this since
they have in the past been well-coordinated. Simon?
I spoke with Paul recently and my understanding is that
he hasn't been actively working in this area for over a year now.

I guess there are some stale patches in his tree.
That is certainly what it looks like.  So, do I remove the sh{,.-current)
trees (git://github.com/pmundt/linux-sh.git#sh-{latest,fixes-for-linus})
from linux-next permanently?  Will it be cleaned up any time soon?

Is anyone maintaining/supporting sh now?  Is it a candidate for pruning?
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140110/16f407ca/attachment.sig>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help