[PATCH V2 0/4] misc: xgene: Add support for APM X-Gene SoC Queue Manager/Traffic Manager
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg KH)
Date: 2014-01-05 18:01:13
Also in:
linux-devicetree, lkml, netdev
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 09:39:08PM -0800, Loc Ho wrote:
Hi,quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
This patch adds support for APM X-Gene SoC Queue Manager/Traffic Manager. QMTM is required by APM X-Gene SoC Ethernet, PktDMA (XOR Engine) and Security Engine subsystems. All subsystems communicate with QMTM using messages which include information about the work to be performed and the location of associated data buffers.Please describe here what the purpose of the qmtm is, as this is not entirely clear from the code. In particular, please describe how this differs from a dmaengine driver and why it is not possible to extend the dma slave API to describe qmtm as a dma engine.[Loc Ho] If the QM driver implements the DMA API, what about the actual DMA engine driver which interfaces with this QM driver. We would have DMA client interfaces with the X-Gene DMA driver (not available yet) via DMA API which in turn interfaces with this QM driver via DMA API. Won't this be kind of awkward? Also, the QM only manage messages (or descriptors) which are 32-bytes or 64-bytes. It doesn't actually do any data transfer of various sizes.Please describe here what the purpose of the qmtm is, as this is not entirely clear from the code or from your reply. Greg was guessing that it's a bus controller, my best guess is a DMA engine. If it's something completely different, you have to let us know what it is so we can do a proper review rather than guessing. Please provide a link to the data sheet if you are unable to explain.Here is URL to a text document explaining role of QMTM device with CPU, Ethernet subsystem. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B28TgQZ3JLoRRGNnbjJoUGNHWW8/edit?usp=sharingThere is nothing at this link :(I tried click on the txt file link from web site http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg264628.html and don't see any problem with accessing the txt file.
Now it's working :) Anyway, as this is a .txt file, why wasn't it just sent in email, and added to the patch series as a documentation file? thanks, greg k-h