[PATCHv8 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
From: Li.Xiubo at freescale.com <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-03 09:19:33
Also in:
linux-pwm, lkml
Hi Arnd,
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support On Thursday 02 January 2014 17:57:01 Xiubo Li wrote:quoted
+static inline u32 ftm_readl(bool big_endian, const void __iomem *addr) +{ + u32 val; + + val = __raw_readl(addr); + + if (likely(big_endian)) + val = be32_to_cpu((__force __be32)val); + else + val = le32_to_cpu((__force __le32)val); + rmb(); + + return val; +} + +static inline void ftm_writel(bool big_endian, u32 val, void __iomem *addr) +{ + wmb(); + if (likely(big_endian)) + val = (__force u32)cpu_to_be32(val); + else + val = (__force u32)cpu_to_le32(val); + + __raw_writel(val, addr);These functions definitely need some comments regarding why this is necessary. I assume that after 8 rounds of review (that I did not read) this has been discussed already, so please explain above the functions why you don't just use ioread32be/ioread32 and iowrite32be/iowrite32 here.
As Thierry has commonts in some days before: ---- A few years ago GregKH commented in response to a patch that ioread*() weren't supposed to be used for memory-mapped only devices. The original purpose apparently was to allow drivers to work with both I/O and memory-mapped devices. ---- I'm not very sure. The big-endian supports is added at v7~v8 patch series.
Also all callers seem to be of the style
val = ftm_readl(fpc->big_endian, fpc->base + FTM_SC);
so I wonder why you don't just pass the fpc pointer to the function
and make it
static inline void ftm_readl(struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc, unsigned long reg, u32
val)
{
if (fpc->big_endian)
iowrite32be(val, fpc->base + reg);
else
iowrite32(val, fpc->base + reg);
}Yes, it was. I thought this will make the ftm_readl/ftm_writel look more brief like other drivers. Thanks very much. -- Best Regards, Xiubo