[PATCH 4/6] ARM: tegra: rework fuse.c
From: pdeschrijver@nvidia.com (Peter De Schrijver)
Date: 2014-01-02 14:32:33
Also in:
linux-tegra, lkml
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:37:43PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Peter De Schrijver [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Reduce fuse.c to the minimum functionality required for the early bootstages. Also export tegra_read_straps() for use by the fuse driver. Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>Aha, but why?
The efuse driver in patch 2 of this series, adds the randomness, so we don't need to add it here then?
quoted
-static void __init tegra20_fuse_init_randomness(void) -{ - u32 randomness[2]; - - randomness[0] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_UID_LOW); - randomness[1] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_UID_HIGH); - - add_device_randomness(randomness, sizeof(randomness)); -} - -/* Applies to Tegra30 or later */ -static void __init tegra30_fuse_init_randomness(void) -{ - u32 randomness[7]; - - randomness[0] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_VENDOR_CODE); - randomness[1] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_FAB_CODE); - randomness[2] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_LOT_CODE_0); - randomness[3] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_LOT_CODE_1); - randomness[4] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_WAFER_ID); - randomness[5] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_X_COORDINATE); - randomness[6] = tegra_fuse_readl(FUSE_Y_COORDINATE); - - add_device_randomness(randomness, sizeof(randomness)); -}We still want to get this into the random pool right? Can it not simply be moved to a later initcall then?
Yes, it's done in the efuse driver now, do you think that's too late? Cheers, Peter.