Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 6 authors, 2013-12-18

[PATCH 2/5] arm: shmobile: r7s72100: add i2c clocks

flat view

From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Date: 2013-12-18 14:44:30
Also in: linux-i2c, linux-sh

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hello.

On 18-12-2013 17:49, Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -173,6 +179,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
        CLKDEV_CON_ID("mtu2_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP33]),
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
        /* ICK */
+       CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee000.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP97]),
+       CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee400.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP96]),
+       CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee800.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP95]),
+       CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfeec00.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP94]),
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
    These belong to some other place, the group marked by /* ICK */
is only for CLKDEV_ICK_ID().
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
So, I'll create a /* DEV */ prefix?
quoted
quoted
quoted
    I really don't know. Other places have /* MSTP */ comment in this
case despite all clocks, CLKDEV_DEV_ID() and CLKDEV_ICK_ID() are
really MSTP clocks. I considered the idea of separating
CLKDEV_ICK_ID() under /* ICK */ comment silly from the very start
but Simon didn't listen to me.
quoted
quoted
I am puzzled, too. ICK is a type of registration and not a clock domain.
Also, there is 'mtu2_fck' which is under ICK as well as MSTP? Looks
wrong. From what I understand now, removing the /* ICK */ comment would
be easiest and proper?
quoted
I'm not sure that I really understand what all the fuss is about.
quoted
As I understand things the convention that prevails for
MSTP clocks under mach-shmobile is as follows:
quoted
1. Clocks not registered by CLKDEV_ICK_ID() are grouped together
    under /* MSTP */ followed by:
2. Clocks registered using CLKDEV_ICK_ID() are grouped together
    under /* ICK */
quoted
I am unsure of the historical reason for this

   Recent patches by Morimoto-san.

quoted
but it does seem to be consistent.

   No, it doesn't. These comments are *clearly* not consistent and should be
removed at least.
Feel free to contribute patches!

/ magnus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help