[PATCH 2/6] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix incorrect max_discard_to for uSDHC
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-11 01:58:25
Also in:
linux-mmc
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:56:04PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
The default sdhci code use the 1 << 27 as the max timeout counter to to calculate the max_discard_to, however it's not correct for uSDHC since its the max counter is 1 << 28. Implement esdhc_get_max_timeout to handle it correctly. Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <redacted> Reported-by: Ed Sutter <redacted> --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 10 ++++++++++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c index 461a4c3..97b35e1 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c@@ -859,6 +859,15 @@ static int esdhc_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int uhs) return esdhc_change_pinstate(host, uhs); } +unsigned int esdhc_get_max_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host)
static? Shawn
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+{ + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); + struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv; + u32 max_to = esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data) ? 1 << 28 : 1 << 27; + + return max_to / (esdhc_pltfm_get_max_clock(host) / 1000); +} + static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = { .read_l = esdhc_readl_le, .read_w = esdhc_readw_le,@@ -871,6 +880,7 @@ static struct sdhci_ops sdhci_esdhc_ops = { .get_ro = esdhc_pltfm_get_ro, .platform_bus_width = esdhc_pltfm_bus_width, .set_uhs_signaling = esdhc_set_uhs_signaling, + .get_max_timeout = esdhc_get_max_timeout, }; static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata = {-- 1.7.2.rc3