On 30 December 2013 03:47, Mike Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting Tushar Behera (2013-12-26 02:18:58)

quoted

The clocks in S2MPS11 and S5M8767 are managed in the same way, baring
a difference in the register offset. It would be better to update
existing S2MPS11 driver to support the clocks in S5M8767, rather than
creating an almost duplicate driver altogether.

Can you rebase patches #1 & #2 onto clk-next? They do not apply cleanly
as-is.

Regards,
Mike

Commit 1b1ccee1e821 "mfd: s2mps11: Fix build after regmap field rename
in sec-core.c" is also touching this file, which is in Mark's tree
right now. If I rebase
this patch on top clk-next, I am getting conflicts when I merge that
with linux-next.
Let me know how you want to handle this.

I am attaching the rebased patches for your reference.
If you want, I will send them again through git-send-email.

-- 
Tushar Behera
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-clk-clk-s2mps11-Refactor-for-including-support-for-o.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2904 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131230/fbd9b99e/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0002-clk-clk-s2mps11-Add-support-for-clocks-in-S5M8767-MF.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2224 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131230/fbd9b99e/attachment-0001.bin>