On Friday 20 December 2013, David Brown wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c
index 16e6183..1f11d93 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt.c
@@ -26,7 +26,16 @@ static const char * const msm_dt_match[] __initconst = {
NULL
};
+static const char * const apq8074_dt_match[] __initconst = {
+ "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard",
+ NULL
+};
+
DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
.smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
.dt_compat = msm_dt_match,
MACHINE_END
+
+DT_MACHINE_START(APQ_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
+ .dt_compat = apq8074_dt_match,
+MACHINE_END--
Why can't you reuse the MSM_DT definition and just add the dragonboard
to the list of compatible machines? The presence of the smp_ops pointer
should not matter if you don't support SMP.
Arnd