[RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64
From: Hanjun Guo <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-04 14:30:24
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
From: Hanjun Guo <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-04 14:30:24
Also in:
linux-acpi, lkml
On 2013?12?04? 01:12, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Hanjun Guo [off-list ref] wrote:
[...]
+#ifndef _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H +#define _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H + +static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) +{ + return false; /* always false for now */ +} + +static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf) +{ + return; +} + +#endif /*_ASM_ARM_ACPI_H*/diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h index 45b20cd..73b1d3a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h@@ -162,6 +162,17 @@ static inline void spin_lock_prefetch(const void *x) #define HAVE_ARCH_PICK_MMAP_LAYOUT +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPIThe ifdef is not necessary.
Good catch, will fix it in next version. Thanks for the comments. Hanjun