address translation for PCIe-to-localbus bridge
From: Jason Gunthorpe <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-07 17:01:47
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 10:07:01AM +0100, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
On 11/06/2013 09:07 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:quoted
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:38:33PM +0100, Gerlando Falauto wrote:[...]quoted
Each translation represents something concrete: 0x8 -> 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x00000008 This is the BAR 0 decoder of the PCI device 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x00000008 -> 0x82000000 0x1 8 This is the PCI bridge's memory window decoder 0x82000000 0x1 8 -> MBUS_ID(0x04, 0xe8) 8 This is the MBUS window associated with the PEX MBUS_ID(0x04, 0xe8) 8 -> 0xe0000008 This is the physical CPU BUS address associated with the MBUS windowUhm, OK, sounds good. Except you must know the whole mapping in advance. Fair enough. Would that work without the whole mbus driver (I guess Ezequiel's)? I'm dealing with 3.10.
Yes, I am using this in 3.10. On 3.10 the ranges at the mbus level has to match the hardwired address mapping in Linux.
Where does the 0x82000000 come from? What about the 0x1 (second cell)?
0x82000000 is part of the OF PCI spec, it indicates the address space is memory (vs io, vs prefetchable memory, etc) The 0x1 is an arbitary unique value that matches the next ranges. It would probably have been clearer if it was MBUS_ID(0x04, 0xe8) instead...
quoted
ranges = <0x00000000 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x08000000 0x8000000>; It is possible as well to do this in code in the FPGA driver.Uhm... why? And how? You mean dynamically upgrading the ranges window?
If you can't predict where your BAR will be assigned when you create the DT then you could update the ranges value at runtime in your pci driver before probing the children. A bit hacky.
quoted
quoted
How would you also deal with a second (let's say identical) device on BAR1?ranges = <0x00000000 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x08000000 0x8000000 // BAR 0 0x10000000 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x08000000 0x8000000> // BAR 1Aren't in this case the two regions aliased? Shouldn't the fourth column on either row be 0x00000000? Like:
Yes, you are right!
ranges = <0x00000000 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x8000000 // BAR 0 0x10000000 0x82000000 0x00000000 0x08000000 0x8000000> // BAR 1quoted
Use reg <0x10000abc xxx> to refer to the 2nd BAR. There are other ways to organize things.Now I completely lost you. According to the above description (BTW, I like the double space to separate groups -- it makes this whole mess a little messy!) the child address should have a single cell. Why use two then?
0x10000abc is the address, xxxx is the size, reg always has address + size Jason