[PATCHv6+ 01/13] of: introduce of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args()
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2013-11-21 18:57:32
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-iommu, linux-tegra, lkml
On 11/21/2013 10:17 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Iterating over a property containing a list of phandles with arguments is a common operation for device drivers. This patch adds a new of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args() macro to make the iteration simpler. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <redacted> --- v6+: Use the description, which Grant Likely proposed, to be full enough that a future reader can figure out why a patch was written. http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2013-November/007062.html
This new version only addresses one of the concerns that Grant had, namely the commit message.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
+#define of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args) \ + for (i = 0; !of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list, cells, i, args); i++) +
Grant also wanted the actual implementation fixed so that it wasn't so
inefficient.
What this current patch does is basically:
for every entry in the property:
for every entry in the property before the current index:
parse the phandle+specifier
That's roughly O(n^2). (n is # entries in the property)
Instead, what should happen is:
for every entry in the property:
parse the phandle+specifier
yield the result
That's roughly O(n).
In other words, an implementation more along the lines of
include/linux/of.h's:
#define of_property_for_each_u32(np, propname, prop, p, u) \
for (prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL), \
p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, NULL, &u); \
p; \
p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &u))
... so you'd need functions like of_prop_first_specifier() and
of_prop_next_specifier(), and perhaps some associated set of state
variables, perhaps with all the state wrapped into a single struct for
simplicity.