On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:07:37PM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote:

quoted

Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.

Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c |  109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
index cea1594..e60dae3 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_event * [ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS], hw_events);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [BITS_TO_LONGS(ARMPMU_MAX_HWEVENTS)], used_mask);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct pmu_hw_events, cpu_hw_events);
+static bool is_percpuirq;

This isn't a global property; it should be part of the struct arm_pmu.
The rest of the patch looks ok, but obvious requires you to merge the core
changes first.

Okay. I will incorporate above change in next revision once the core
changes are agreed upon.