On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 08:24:16PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
quoted
Move the power GPIO handling from the board code into
the driver. This is a dependency for device tree support.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <redacted>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c | 2 ++
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c | 11 ++--------
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/sdio.c | 21 +++++++++++++-----
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/spi.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++----------
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl1251/wl1251.h | 2 +-
include/linux/wl12xx.h | 2 +-
6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
...
quoted
diff --git a/include/linux/wl12xx.h b/include/linux/wl12xx.h
index b516b4f..a9c723b 100644
--- a/include/linux/wl12xx.h
+++ b/include/linux/wl12xx.h
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ enum {
};
struct wl1251_platform_data {
- void (*set_power)(bool enable);
+ int power_gpio;
/* SDIO only: IRQ number if WLAN_IRQ line is used, 0 for SDIO IRQs */
int irq;
bool use_eeprom;--
What a reason for not using regulator API here with GPIO-based
regulator?
I think this pin is not used as power supply, but like an enable pin
for low power states. Of course the regulator API could still be
(mis?)used for this, but I think it would be the first linux device
driver doing this.
Note: I don't have wl1251 documentation.
-- Sebastian
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131027/667702b7/attachment-0001.sig>