[PATCH v6 12/19] swiotlb: don't assume that io_tlb_start-io_tlb_end is coherent
From: Stefano Stabellini <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-02 17:32:43
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:quoted
The swiotlb code has appropriate calls to dma_mark_clean in place for buffers passed to swiotlb_map_page as an argument. However it assumes that the swiotlb bounce buffer (io_tlb_start-io_tlb_end) is already coherent and doesn't need any calls to dma_mark_clean. On ARM the swiotlb bounce buffer is not coherent (the memory is writealloc while it should be bufferable) and therefore we need to call dma_mark_clean appropriately on the bounce buffer code paths too. Note that most architecures have an empty dma_mark_clean implementation anyway.The other architecture that uses swiotlb is IA64 and that does have an implementation where it touches on page attributes. Which means I have to figure out why my HP zx6000 won't boot with 3.11 now :-(
Now this is a very thorny issue. Honestly I don't like the dma_mark_clean interface very much: it's one big hammer, when we actually need some finesse to handle coherency. For example on ARM some devices might not need the dma_mark_clean call, while others do. Calling it all the times is at the very best inefficient and incorrect at worst. I am thinking of calling the original map/unmap_page functions instead (arm_dma_map_page or arm_coherent_dma_map_page in the arm case). However in order to do that I would need to add more __get_dma_ops calls in both lib/swiotlb.c and drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
quoted
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <redacted> --- lib/swiotlb.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c index 4e8686c..eb45d17 100644 --- a/lib/swiotlb.c +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c@@ -515,6 +515,7 @@ found: io_tlb_orig_addr[index+i] = orig_addr + (i << IO_TLB_SHIFT); if (dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL) swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(tlb_addr), size); return tlb_addr; }@@ -547,7 +548,10 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, * First, sync the memory before unmapping the entry */ if (orig_addr && ((dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) || (dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL))) + { + dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(tlb_addr), size); swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + } /* * Return the buffer to the free list by setting the corresponding@@ -587,17 +591,20 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, switch (target) { case SYNC_FOR_CPU: - if (likely(dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) + if (likely(dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) { + dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(tlb_addr), size); swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + } else BUG_ON(dir != DMA_TO_DEVICE); break; case SYNC_FOR_DEVICE: - if (likely(dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) + if (likely(dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) { swiotlb_bounce(orig_addr, tlb_addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); - else + dma_mark_clean(phys_to_virt(tlb_addr), size); + } else BUG_ON(dir != DMA_FROM_DEVICE); break; default:-- 1.7.2.5