Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 2 authors, 2013-10-03

[PATCH v2 00/12] Introduce common infra for tegra clocks

From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2013-10-01 17:39:16
Also in: linux-tegra, lkml

On 09/23/2013 08:24 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
This patchset introduces common infrastructure for clocks which exist in
several Tegra SoCs. We also move Tegra114 to this new infrastructure.
Tegra20 and Tegra30 will be moved later in separate patchsets.

Changes since v1:
+ move common clks allocation to patch 2
+ adapt also Tegra20 and Tegra30 to the changes in patch 2

Boottested on dalmore, beaverboard and seaboard.
What commit is this series based on? I applied the two pre-requisites:

ARM: tegra114: add missing clocks to binding.eml
clk: tegra: replace enum tegra114_clk by binding header.eml

... but still got a bunch of conflicts when applying this. I guess at
least commit 819c1de "clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag" isn't in
the history of this series. Consequently, I gave up and didn't test this.

Also, I had given a lot of feedback on v1. Admittedly I should have
reviewed v2 since it appeared just before I reviewed v1, but I expect
most of the feedback still applies given the limited list of changes
listed above. Certainly, this series still removes the "dsib" clock yet
I expect it shouldn't (patch 1, in the change to
tegra114_periph_clk_init()), and that's the very first piece of feedback
I gave on v1, and also causes the first "git am" conflict with
CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help