[PATCHv4 2/2] clocksource: dw_apb_timer_of: Fix read_sched_clock
From: Dinh Nguyen <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-23 15:58:31
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 13:32 +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. September 2013, 13:01:59 schrieb Pavel Machek:quoted
On Wed 2013-09-18 00:42:36, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, dinguyen at altera.com wrote:And now we can't get the code fixed so that it at least works on our hardware, because, guess what, you noticed upstream merged the gem below, and you don't like it?quoted
static int num_called; static void __init dw_apb_timer_init(struct device_node *timer) { switch (num_called) { case 0: pr_debug("%s: found clockevent timer\n", __func__); add_clockevent(timer); of_node_put(timer); break; case 1: pr_debug("%s: found clocksource timer\n", __func__); add_clocksource(timer); of_node_put(timer); init_sched_clock(); break; default: break; } num_called++; } So if you can use different nodes for clockevent and clocksource, why is that supposed to be dependent on the ordering? That's not how DT is supposed to be used. DT provides a clear description of the hardware, not some ordering dependent magic amended by utterly useless pr_debug() constructs.You already had non-ugly version in your tree. Alternatively, tell us what you want done. These boards have 2 to 4 identical timers, that can serve as both clockevent and clocksource. We'd like to use one as clockevent and one as clocksource.I would also be interested in the "right" way to do this. As Pavel already said, the hardware is identical for all N separate timer blocks, so as the DT should be describing the hardware only, there is no way to specifiy one for the clockevent and another for the clocksource there. At first I kept using the non-standard init which required it being called from platform code, but got the request to convert the driver to use CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE to remove the need for separate call. As you will know CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE calls the init function for each found dt node for a matching device, resulting in N calls to dw_apb_timer_init. So my solution was to just grab the first one as clockevent and second one as clocksource. Therefore I'm all ears for how to solve this in a better way :-)
I'm just wondering if you have gotten a chance to give this patch anymore thought? The state of the socfpga platform for 3.12 is that it will not boot without this patch(mainly because of a DTS binding change). This patch mainly only fixes that issue. If you would like dw_apb_timer_init() fix for 3.13, can you please give us advice, so that we can get started on it in time for 3.13? Thanks, Dinh
Heiko