Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 2 authors, 2013-09-02
DORMANTno replies

[RFC PATCH 04/14] arm64: kernel: suspend/resume registers save/restore

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-02 16:24:40
Also in: linux-pm

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:17:17PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 10:57:28AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 12:35:56PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
quoted
Power management software requires the kernel to save and restore
CPU registers while going through suspend and resume operations
triggered by kernel subsystems like CPU idle and suspend to RAM.

This patch implements code that provides save and restore mechanism
for the arm v8 implementation. Memory for the context is passed as
parameter to both cpu_do_suspend and cpu_do_resume functions, and allows
the callers to implement context allocation as they deem fit.

The registers that are saved and restored correspond to the registers
actually required by the kernel to be up and running and is by no means
a complete save and restore of the entire v8 register set.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h |  3 ++
 arch/arm64/mm/proc.S              | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
index 7cdf466..0c657bb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/proc-fns.h
@@ -26,11 +26,14 @@
 #include <asm/page.h>
 
 struct mm_struct;
+struct cpu_suspend_ctx;
 
 extern void cpu_cache_off(void);
 extern void cpu_do_idle(void);
 extern void cpu_do_switch_mm(unsigned long pgd_phys, struct mm_struct *mm);
 extern void cpu_reset(unsigned long addr) __attribute__((noreturn));
+extern void cpu_do_suspend(struct cpu_suspend_ctx *ptr);
+extern u64 cpu_do_resume(phys_addr_t ptr, u64 idmap_ttbr);
 
 #include <asm/memory.h>
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
index a82ae88..193bf98 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -80,6 +80,70 @@ ENTRY(cpu_do_idle)
 	ret
 ENDPROC(cpu_do_idle)
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CPU_SUSPEND
+/**
+ * cpu_do_suspend - save CPU registers context
+ * x0: virtual address of context pointer
+ */
+ENTRY(cpu_do_suspend)
+	mrs	x1, tpidr_el0
+	str	x1, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TPIDR_EL0]
+	mrs	x2, tpidrro_el0
+	str	x2, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TPIDRRO_EL0]
+	mrs	x3, contextidr_el1
+	str	x3, [x0, #CPU_CTX_CTXIDR_EL1]
+	mrs	x4, mair_el1
+	str	x4, [x0, #CPU_CTX_MAIR_EL1]
+	mrs	x5, cpacr_el1
+	str	x5, [x0, #CPU_CTX_CPACR_EL1]
+	mrs	x6, ttbr1_el1
+	str	x6, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TTBR1_EL1]
+	mrs	x7, tcr_el1
+	str	x7, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TCR_EL1]
+	mrs	x8, vbar_el1
+	str	x8, [x0, #CPU_CTX_VBAR_EL1]
+	mrs	x9, sctlr_el1
+	str	x9, [x0, #CPU_CTX_SCTLR_EL1]
+	ret
+ENDPROC(cpu_do_suspend)
Can you read all the registers a once and do some stp to save them?
Yes, absolutely. In a way the store pair will require an assumption on
the context structure layout - eg:

	mrs	x1, tpidr_el0
	mrs	x2, tpidrro_el0
	stp	x1, x2, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TPIDR_EL0]

implicitly assumes that the storage for TPIDR_EL0 and TPIDRRO_EL0 is
contiguous, we can't change the layout later, but I guess we can live
with that.
Do we need to access the individual saved registers from this structure,
outside the suspend/resume code? Otherwise we could simply have a plain
array to save the registers.
Well, there are some registers in the struct that need to be accessed
from C code through pointer dereference (eg ttbr0), but actually for
the registers that I save and restore in this snippet of code I do not see a
point in creating the assembly immediates.

Hence answer is no. I could make the struct context something like:

struct cpu_suspend_context {
	/*
	 * first two are named members so that they can be easily
	 * accessed in C and through assembly immediates
	 */
	unsigned long sp;
	unsigned long ttbr0;
	unsigned long saved_regs[10];  //regs to be saved restored
};

or encapsulate the saved_regs in a struct, even though for the time being it
is not really needed.
quoted
quoted
quoted
+/**
+ * cpu_do_resume - registers layout should match the corresponding
+ *                 cpu_do_suspend call
+ *
+ * x0: Physical address of context pointer
+ * x1: Should contain the physical address of identity map page tables
+ *     used to turn on the MMU and complete context restore
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ *	sctlr value in x0
+ */
+ENTRY(cpu_do_resume)
+	tlbi	vmalle1is	// make sure tlb entries are invalid
+	ldr	x2, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TPIDR_EL0]
+	msr	tpidr_el0, x2
+	ldr	x3, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TPIDRRO_EL0]
+	msr	tpidrro_el0, x3
+	ldr	x4, [x0, #CPU_CTX_CTXIDR_EL1]
+	msr	contextidr_el1, x4
+	ldr	x5, [x0, #CPU_CTX_MAIR_EL1]
+	msr	mair_el1, x5
+	ldr	x6, [x0, #CPU_CTX_CPACR_EL1]
+	msr	cpacr_el1, x6
+	msr	ttbr0_el1, x1
+	ldr	x7, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TTBR1_EL1]
+	msr	ttbr1_el1, x7
+	ldr	x8, [x0, #CPU_CTX_TCR_EL1]
+	msr	tcr_el1, x8
+	ldr	x9, [x0, #CPU_CTX_VBAR_EL1]
+	msr	vbar_el1, x9
+	ldr	x0, [x0, #CPU_CTX_SCTLR_EL1]
+	isb
+	dsb	sy
+	ret
+ENDPROC(cpu_do_resume)
Same here, use ldp.

BTW, do we need the DSB here or just the ISB?
A dsb is required to ensure that the tlb invalidate has completed, I
think it is mandatory from an architectural standpoint but please
correct me if I am wrong.
Yes, it's needed for that (though usually it comes before isb, but in
this case the MMU is disabled anyway, so it doesn't matter).
Ok, thanks.

Lorenzo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help