new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1

From: richard -rw- weinberger <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-28 09:03:23
Also in: linux-omap, lkml

2013-09-30 · new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 · Dave.Martin@arm.com (Dave Martin)
2013-09-28 · Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 · Pavel Machek <hidden>
2013-09-27 · Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 · Pavel Machek <hidden>
2013-09-26 · Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 · Rob Landley <hidden>
2013-09-26 · Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 · Rob Landley <hidden>

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Rob,

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Rob Landley [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Some of us can't ship GPLv3 binaries and are looking forward to the day LLVM
or some such provides a complete solution.

Sorry, I didn't have a coffee yet, but which subtility am I missing
that prohibits
you from shipping GPLv3 binaries?

/me had coffee but still doesn't get why you can't ship GPLv3 binaries.
Rob, can you please enlighten us?

-- 
Thanks,
//richard