[RFT PATCH v1 6/7] amd64: avoid saving and restoring FPSIMD registers until threads access them
From: Jiang Liu <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-27 14:20:21
Also in:
lkml
On 09/27/2013 06:59 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 09:04:46AM +0100, Jiang Liu wrote:quoted
From: Jiang Liu <redacted> Use PF_USED_MATH flag to mark whether the thread has accessed any FPSIMD registers, so we could avoid saving and restroing FPSIMD registers until threads access them. This may improve performance when lazy FPSIMD restore is disabled.Hehe, the subject made me smile :) I suppose that means I have to give a semi-useful review for the patch...quoted
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <redacted> Cc: Jiang Liu <redacted> --- arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c index 267e54a..a81af5f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c@@ -99,7 +99,8 @@ void fpsimd_disable_lazy_restore(void) * If lazy mode is enabled, caller needs to disable preemption * when calling fpsimd_load_state_lazy() and fpsimd_save_state_lazy(). */ -static void fpsimd_load_state_lazy(struct fpsimd_state *state) +static void fpsimd_load_state_lazy(struct fpsimd_state *state, + struct task_struct *tsk) { /* Could we reuse the hardware context? */ if (state->last_cpu == smp_processor_id() &&@@ -109,13 +110,19 @@ static void fpsimd_load_state_lazy(struct fpsimd_state *state) if (static_key_false(&fpsimd_lazy_mode)) { fpsimd_clear_on_hw(state); fpsimd_enable_trap(); - } else { + } else if (tsk_used_math(tsk)) { + fpsimd_disable_trap(); fpsimd_load_state(state); + } else { + fpsimd_enable_trap();One thing worth checking in sequences like this is that you have the relevant memory barriers (isb instructions) to ensure that the CPU is synchronised wrt side-effects from the msr instructions. *Some* operations are self-synchronising, but I don't think this is the case for fpsimd in v8 (although I haven't re-checked). Your earlier patch (3/7) doesn't seem to have any of these barriers.
Hi Will,
Thanks for reminder, I tried to confirm this by scanning over
ARMv8 reference manual but failed. So how about changing the code as:
static inline void fpsimd_enable_trap(void)
{
u32 __val;
asm volatile ("mrs %0, cpacr_el1\n"
"tbz %w0, #20, 1f\n"
"and %w0, %w0, #0xFFCFFFFF\n"
"msr cpacr_el1, %0\n"
"isb\n"
"1:"
: "=&r" (__val));
}
static inline void fpsimd_disable_trap(void)
{
u32 __val;
asm volatile ("mrs %0, cpacr_el1\n"
"tbnz %w0, #20, 1f\n"
"orr %w0, %w0, #0x000300000\n"
"msr cpacr_el1, %0\n"
"isb\n"
"1:"
: "=&r" (__val));
}
Thanks!
Gerry
Will