On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:07:23PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:

Hi,

-- Adding more maintainers in the To: list --

Ping about the patch set, is this one acceptable for mainline?

The below looks to be mostly ARM bits and I would suspect Will to take
care of them.

On 9 September 2013 12:00, Jean Pihet [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

 arch/arm/Kconfig                        |  2 +
 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild        |  1 +
 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h   | 23 +++++++++++
 arch/arm/kernel/Makefile                |  1 +
 arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c             | 30 ++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/arm/Makefile            |  3 ++
 tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/perf/config/Makefile              |  9 +++--
 tools/perf/util/unwind.c                | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------

This one looks to be generic code, Acme who do we want to look at that?

quoted

 10 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h
 create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c

--
1.7.11.7