[PATCH v5 11/13] xen: introduce xen_alloc/free_coherent_pages
From: Stefano Stabellini <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-06 16:10:14
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 03:59:02PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:quoted
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 05:43:33PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:quoted
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:quoted
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 07:32:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:quoted
xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent needs to allocate a coherent buffer for cpu and devices. On native x86 and ARMv8 is sufficient to call __get_free_pages in order to get a coherent buffer, while on ARM we need to call arm_dma_ops.alloc.Don't bet on this for ARMv8. It's not mandated for the architecture, so at some point some SoC will require non-cacheable buffers for coherency.I see. Would it be better if I implemented xen_alloc_coherent_pages on armv8 by calling arm64_swiotlb_dma_ops.alloc?What does this buffer do exactly? Is it allocated by guests?It is allocated by Dom0 to do DMA to/from a device. It is the buffer that is going to be returned by dma_map_ops.alloc to the caller: On x86: dma_map_ops.alloc -> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent -> xen_alloc_coherent_pages -> __get_free_pages On ARM: dma_map_ops.alloc -> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent -> xen_alloc_coherent_pages -> arm_dma_ops.alloc On ARM64 dma_map_ops.alloc -> xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent -> xen_alloc_coherent_pages -> ????OK, I'm getting more confused. Do all the above calls happen in the guest, Dom0, or a mix?
I guess the confusion comes from a difference in terminology: dom0 is a guest like the others, just a bit more privileged. We usually call domU a normal unprivileged guest. The above calls would happen in Dom0 (when an SMMU is not available). They could also happen in a DomU if we assign a physical device to it (and an SMMU is not available). So in general they would happen in any guest that needs to program a real device.