Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 2 authors, 2013-09-05

[PATCH v4 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver support

From: Lu Jingchang-B35083 <hidden>
Date: 2013-09-02 07:33:00
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinod Koul [mailto:vinod.koul at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 2:37 PM
To: Lu Jingchang-B35083
Cc: shawn.guo at linaro.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver support

On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 07:10:53AM +0000, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Vinod Koul [mailto:vinod.koul at intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 12:51 PM
To: Lu Jingchang-B35083
Cc: shawn.guo at linaro.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
kernel at lists.infradead.org; devicetree at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] dma: Add Freescale eDMA engine driver
support
quoted
quoted
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:32:04AM +0000, Lu Jingchang-B35083 wrote:

Please use a right MUA and wrap your lines at 80chars...
quoted
quoted
quoted
[Lu Jingchang]
No need to put your name :)
[Lu Jingchang-b35083]
Aha, the Microsoft Outlook adds this automatically with default option.
You can change that!!
Thanks.
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+static bool fsl_edma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void
*fn_param)
quoted
quoted
quoted
+{
+	struct fsl_edma_filter_param *fparam = fn_param;
+	struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan = to_fsl_edma_chan(chan);
+
+	if (fsl_chan->edmamux->mux_id != fparam->mux_id)
+		return false;
+
+	fsl_chan->slot_id = fparam->slot_id;
+	chan->private = fn_param;
why do you need to use chan->private?
[Lu Jingchang]
The private used here is to store the slot_id information, which
must
quoted
quoted
be used
quoted
by the DMAMUX in alloc_chan_resources function. Thanks.
Why dont you pass this in struct dma_slave_config memeber slave_id
for
quoted
quoted
this.
[Lu Jingchang-b35083]
I will drop this private and setup the slave_id directly in the filter
function.
why in filter? before calling prepare function you can set the slave
config
How about change the filter_fn to follow:
static bool fsl_edma_filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *fn_param)
{
        struct fsl_edma_filter_param *fparam = fn_param;
        struct fsl_edma_chan *fsl_chan = to_fsl_edma_chan(chan);
        unsigned char val;

        if (fsl_chan->edmamux->mux_id != fparam->mux_id)
                return false;

        val = EDMAMUX_CHCFG_ENBL | EDMAMUX_CHCFG_SOURCE(fparam->slot_id);
        fsl_edmamux_config_chan(fsl_chan, val);
        return true;
}
In fact the slot_id isn't need elsewhere, and if the filter return true, 
This channel should be to this request. So no need to save the slave id, Right?



Best Regareds,
Jingchang
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help