Hi Rajendra,

On Wednesday 21 August 2013 05:00 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

On Friday 02 August 2013 07:08 PM, Afzal Mohammed wrote:

quoted

Reuse OMAP4 operations on AM43x.

Signed-off-by: Ambresh K <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c |    8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
index 7f4db12..a1b7e20 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c

@@ -4123,6 +4123,14 @@ void __init omap_hwmod_init(void)
 		soc_ops.init_clkdm = _init_clkdm;
 		soc_ops.update_context_lost = _omap4_update_context_lost;
 		soc_ops.get_context_lost = _omap4_get_context_lost;
+	} else if (soc_is_am43xx()) {
+		soc_ops.enable_module = _omap4_enable_module;
+		soc_ops.disable_module = _omap4_disable_module;
+		soc_ops.wait_target_ready = _omap4_wait_target_ready;
+		soc_ops.assert_hardreset = _omap4_assert_hardreset;
+		soc_ops.deassert_hardreset = _omap4_deassert_hardreset;
+		soc_ops.is_hardreset_asserted = _omap4_is_hardreset_asserted;
+		soc_ops.init_clkdm = _init_clkdm;

Did you leave out soc_ops.update_context_lost and soc_ops.get_context_lost on
purpose?

As far as I understand, primarily driver make use of this with the help
of function pointers passed through platform data. And as am43x is a DT
only platform, it was left out.

Regards
Afzal