Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2013-08-31
STALE4662d
Revisions (7)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v1 [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]
  4. v2 [diff vs current]
  5. v2 current
  6. v2 [diff vs current]
  7. v3 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: dts: imx27 pinctrl

From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
Date: 2013-08-20 07:14:11

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:07:11PM +0200, Markus Pargmann wrote:
Pinctrl driver node and pin group definitions for other driver nodes.

Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <redacted>
---
+					pinctrl_uart_1: uart-1 {
+						fsl,pins = <
+							MX27_PAD_UART1_TXD__UART1_TXD 0x0
+							MX27_PAD_UART1_RXD__UART1_RXD 0x0
+							MX27_PAD_UART1_CTS__UART1_CTS 0x0
+							MX27_PAD_UART1_RTS__UART1_RTS 0x0
+						>;
+					};
The above either misses a group number or an uart number. We need
pinctrl_uart<uartno>_<groupno>

Also this doesn't scale very good. For boards without RTS/CTS we would have
to add a completely different group. For the FEC I've seen different
groups with a dozen pins each which differ in only a single pin.

I therefore suggest (and Shawn acked the general idea already) to
do this:

	pinctrl_uart1_1: uart1-1 {
		fsl,pins = <
			MX27_PAD_UART1_TXD__UART1_TXD 0x0
			MX27_PAD_UART1_RXD__UART1_RXD 0x0
		>;
	};

	pinctrl_uart1_rtscts_1: uart1-rtscts-1 {
		fsl,pins = <
			MX27_PAD_UART1_CTS__UART1_CTS 0x0
			MX27_PAD_UART1_RTS__UART1_RTS 0x0
		>;
	};

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help