Mike Turquette wrote:

[...]

quoted

OK, if new branch is ready, I will replace with that or if re-merge is
required, I will. Either way, I'm fine and can handle. Mike, let me know
your choice :-)

Since I have already published it let's just go with the delta patch.  I
can create another stable branch named clk-next-s3c64xx-delta that just
has this patch on top of clk-next-s3c64xx OR I can apply it on top of
the existing clk-next-s3c64xx and re-merge it.

Sounds good to me. If the branch for the delta is ready, let me know.

I'm trying to think on whether there are any weird git corner cases with
re-merging clk-next-s3c64xx. Let me know if re-merging is somehow unsafe
(makes history weird, or whatever).

I don't think it causes some problem.

Let me know what option is better for you. I'll publish as soon as I get
the delta patch. Apologies again for creating some extra work!

No problem.

Thanks,
Kukjin