[PATCH v3 07/10] xen: introduce XENMEM_get_dma_buf and xen_put_dma_buf
From: Stefano Stabellini <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-14 16:41:52
Also in:
lkml, xen-devel
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
quoted
quoted
+struct xen_get_dma_buf { + /* + * [IN] Details of memory extents to be exchanged (GMFN bases). + * Note that @in.address_bits is ignored and unused.Ohhhh, why? What if the user wants to be it under 2G?Looking a bit more at the code revealed that we stick that in the @out.address_bitsquoted
quoted
+ */ + struct xen_memory_reservation in; + + /* + * [IN/OUT] Details of new memory extents. + * We require that: + * 1. @in.domid == @out.domid + * 2. @in.nr_extents << @in.extent_order == + * @out.nr_extents << @out.extent_order + * 3. @in.extent_start and @out.extent_start lists must not overlap + * 4. @out.extent_start lists GPFN bases to be populated + * 5. @out.extent_start is overwritten with allocated GMFN bases.. which you should document, otherwise the hypervisor might try to give you pages under 2^0..
Yes, you are right. I'll add a note about out.address_bits.
quoted
quoted
+ */ + struct xen_memory_reservation out; + + /* + * [OUT] Number of input extents that were successfully exchanged: + * 1. The first @nr_exchanged input extents were successfully + * deallocated. + * 2. The corresponding first entries in the output extent list correctly + * indicate the GMFNs that were successfully exchanged. + * 3. All other input and output extents are untouched. + * 4. If not all input exents are exchanged then the return code of this + * command will be non-zero. + * 5. THIS FIELD MUST BE INITIALISED TO ZERO BY THE CALLER!as this says the initial value is zero.
This is referring to nr_exchanged.