[PATCH v5 2/4] mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume_noirq callback to clear WAKEUP_INT
From: dianders@chromium.org (Doug Anderson)
Date: 2013-08-09 16:48:34
Also in:
linux-mmc, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
From: dianders@chromium.org (Doug Anderson)
Date: 2013-08-09 16:48:34
Also in:
linux-mmc, linux-samsung-soc, lkml
Fabio, Thanks for your review. On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Fabio Estevam [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Doug Anderson [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
+#else +#define dw_mci_exynos_suspend NULL +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume NULL +#define dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq NULL +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */You could avoid this else block if you use 'static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS' below.quoted
+ static void dw_mci_exynos_prepare_command(struct dw_mci *host, u32 *cmdr) { /*@@ -187,13 +234,20 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return dw_mci_pltfm_register(pdev, drv_data); } +const struct dev_pm_ops dw_mci_exynos_pmops = { + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_mci_exynos_suspend, dw_mci_exynos_resume) + .resume_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq, + .thaw_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq, + .restore_noirq = dw_mci_exynos_resume_noirq, +};static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(dw_mci_exynos_pmops, dw_mci_exynos_suspend, dw_mci_exynos_resume ) ;
The big problem is that SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() doesn't take a "_noirq" parameters. Do you know of one that does? -Doug