[PATCH 1/2] include: dt-binding: input: create a DT header defining key codes.
From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
Date: 2013-08-08 17:13:38
Also in:
linux-input, linux-tegra, lkml
From: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com (Dmitry Torokhov)
Date: 2013-08-08 17:13:38
Also in:
linux-input, linux-tegra, lkml
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:41:20PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 12:58 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
(CC'ing DT bindings maintainers too, hence quoting a bit of the patch) On 08/06/2013 08:12 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:quoted
Many of Key device tree bindings uses the constant number as key code which matches with kernel header key code and then comment as follows for reference/better readability: linux,code = <102>; /* KEY_HOME */ Create a DT header which defines all the key code so that DT key bindings can use it as follows: linux,code = <KEY_HOME>;This looks fine to me. Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <redacted> A comment in support of the patch: This is adding OS-specific content to the DT. However, the bindings this header file supports are already written that way. There's not really any alternative here, since some numbering scheme had to be chosen for keycodes, and it may as well be the same set as the first/primary OS that'll use the binding. As far as merging it, this patch should probably go through the core DT tree, perhaps in a topic branch so that e.g. Tegra an MVEBU can merge it in to apply your subsequent patches (or we can just wait until the next kernel release to merge them in).Do I need to include anyone for this patch to be applied or can go through Dmitry's input git branch?
I am uncomfortable that we are duplicating the whole list of keycodes here. Do you think we could split keycodes and other event codes from include/uapi/linux/input.h into include/uapi/linux/input-events.h and unclude it directly into DTS? Thanks. -- Dmitry