* Greg KH [off-list ref] [130802 01:16]:

On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:53:53AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:

quoted

* Greg KH [off-list ref] [130731 05:39]:

quoted

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:38:03AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:

quoted

Hi all,

Probably the biggest kernel data bloat issue is in the ARM land, but
it also seems that it's becoming a Linux generic issue too, so I
guess it could be discussed in either context.

Why is it specific to ARM?  What is so unique to ARM that causes it to
"bloat"?

I think it has so far showed up on ARM because of no discoverable busses,
but chances are it will be more of a generic problem.

quoted

And what exactly do you mean by "bloat"?

Stuffing data to kernel that should not be in the kernel at all. Or
if the data is needed by kernel, there should be only one set of the
data defined rather than multiple copies of the data built into the
kernel for each SoC or driver variant.

quoted

quoted

Basically the data bloat issue is there for the arch code and drivers
and may not show up initially until things have headed the wrong way for
too long.

What do you mean by this?  You seem to be very vague here.

People are unnecessarily defining registers in kernel for similar devices
over and over again for each new SoC at the arch level and now more and
more at the driver level.

One example of that are device tree based drivers that don't describe
the actual hardware, but instead have a binding that points to an index
of defined registers in the driver.

Ok, and exactly how much "larger" does something like this cost as a
real number, and as a percentage of the size of the kernel?

Well one example has been making omap4 SoC booting device tree only, and
that has reduced the built in kernel data for pinmux, board support and
platform init code by something like 6000 lines, with patches posted to
reduce the clock related build in kernel data by about additional 1700
lines. Sure some of that has moved to live under drivers, but mostly defined
in the .dts files.

But I'm afraid quite a bit of stuff in general is now just moved to
drivers without dealing with the data issues properly. So I'm hoping
we could establish some guidelines on doing things that might help other
maintainers to catch and solve similar issues.

Regards,

Tony