[PATCH v5 00/12] MBus DT binding: A new hope

On Tuesday 02 July 2013, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 04:04:03PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:

quoted

Personally, I can't see any disadvantage, and the binding looks much
cleaner now. But of course I can be wrong, and I'm open to discussion.

There's another pending issue. Arnd Bergmann has required to add a
property to specify the available space within the CPU address space
for decoding windows. This property would allow to support fully
dynamic mbus window allocation.

I wonder if this range is implied - eg it is address space not covered
by the memory node or any mbus ranges? Is there a situation where that
is not sufficient?

I think it's sufficient, yes. It feels odd to have the mbus code rely
on the contents of the memory node for that, but it would work.

	Arnd