On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 13:36:51 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth [off-list ref] wrote:
On 07/07/2013 01:26 PM, Jonas Gorski wrote:
quoted
On Sun, 07 Jul 2013 12:52:52 +0200
Sebastian Hesselbarth[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Anyway, can you please try to have both ports reg properties set
to<0>, with nodes named ethernet0-port at 0 and ethernet1-port at 0,
and the platform_device_alloc in mv643xx_eth modified?
In addition I added a static counter for the allocated devs (to not
overwrite the pointers in port_platdev[]).
Ok, but that is not required to make it work, is it? IMHO we should
honor what is passed by reg property, even it will be always zero
for KW and the other Orion SoCs. Otherwise, we would implicitly put
the numbering in the order of port nodes.
No, picking the next free "slot" should work, too - it was just the
easiest to fix the name for the alloc to what seems to be expected by
other parts.
quoted
That seems to work, as now eth1 comes up and works (successfully got a
IP through DHCP).
Ok, great. Will prepare a fix for mv643xx_eth on top of net-next. And
an update of the kirkwood conversion patches.
Thanks,
Jonas