On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:51:15AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:14:49AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

quoted

Hi Simon,

On Saturday 25 May 2013 10:24:34 Simon Horman wrote:

quoted

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:40:04PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

quoted

Hello,

Here's the second version of the gpio-rcar driver DT bindings. I've tested
the patches on the Marzen board (r8a7779).

Once again I'd appreciate feedback on the DT bindings. I'm particularly
wondering whether getting the number of lines through the gpio-ranges
property instead of using a dedicated #gpio-lines property as in v1 is a
good idea.

Changes since v1:

- Initialize the gpiochip dev field at probe time.
- Add the gpio-ranges property.
- Remove the #gpio-lines property. The number of lines is now passed
through> 
  the gpio-ranges property.

Laurent Pinchart (2):
  gpio-rcar: Make the platform data gpio_base field signed
  gpio-rcar: Add DT support
 
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt | 52 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                           | 66 +++++++++++++----
 include/linux/platform_data/gpio-rcar.h            |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt

Hi Magnus,

could you please review these changes?

I've received Magnus' ack face-to-face last week. I'm not sure whether that's 
a proper procedure, but I'm sure he will confirm that if needed.

Its sufficient for my needs.

quoted

Could you please take the patch in your tree for v3.11 ?

Sure, I'll see what I can do.

I have queued this up in the gpio-rcar branch.