Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 4 authors, 2013-07-29

[PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: single: Prepare for supporting SoC specific features

From: haojian.zhuang@gmail.com (Haojian Zhuang)
Date: 2013-06-08 09:37:36
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap

On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:
Let's replace is_pinconf with flags and add struct pcs_soc so we
can support also other features like pin wake-up events. Let's
export the probe so the SoC specific modules can pass their
SoC specific data to pinctrl-single if needed.

Done in collaboration with Roger Quadros [off-list ref].
Manjunathappa's pinctrl-single patch on enhancing bits is already merged.
This patch conflicts with his patch.

Could you rebase your patches?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <redacted>
Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.h |   15 +++++++++++
 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.h
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
index b9fa046..0f178d1 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c
@@ -1368,7 +1367,8 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcs->pingroups);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcs->functions);
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pcs->gpiofuncs);
-       pcs->is_pinconf = match->data;
+       pcs->flags = soc->flags;
+       pcs->soc = soc;

        PCS_GET_PROP_U32("pinctrl-single,register-width", &pcs->width,
                         "register width not specified\n");
@@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        pcs->desc.name = DRIVER_NAME;
        pcs->desc.pctlops = &pcs_pinctrl_ops;
        pcs->desc.pmxops = &pcs_pinmux_ops;
-       if (pcs->is_pinconf)
+       if (pcs->flags & PCS_HAS_PINCONF)
                pcs->desc.confops = &pcs_pinconf_ops;
        pcs->desc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
@@ -1466,8 +1466,20 @@ free:

        return ret;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_single_probe);
+
+static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       const struct of_device_id *match;
+
+       match = of_match_device(pcs_of_match, &pdev->dev);
+       if (!match)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       return pinctrl_single_probe(pdev, (struct pcs_soc *)match->data);
+}
I think that you should declare pcs_probe() as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL.
Is it right?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
-static int pcs_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+int pinctrl_single_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct pcs_device *pcs = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
@@ -1478,17 +1490,26 @@ static int pcs_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)

        return 0;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pinctrl_single_remove);
Since you redefined pcs_probe(), you needn't change pcs_remove to
pinctrl_single_remove().
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+static struct pcs_soc pinctrl_single = {
+       .flags = 0,
+};
+
+static struct pcs_soc pinconf_single = {
+       .flags = PCS_HAS_PINCONF,
+};

 static struct of_device_id pcs_of_match[] = {
-       { .compatible = "pinctrl-single", .data = (void *)false },
-       { .compatible = "pinconf-single", .data = (void *)true },
+       { .compatible = "pinctrl-single", .data = &pinctrl_single },
+       { .compatible = "pinconf-single", .data = &pinconf_single },
        { },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pcs_of_match);

 static struct platform_driver pcs_driver = {
        .probe          = pcs_probe,
-       .remove         = pcs_remove,
+       .remove         = pinctrl_single_remove,
        .driver = {
                .owner          = THIS_MODULE,
                .name           = DRIVER_NAME,
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18f3205
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
Do you need append "#ifndef __XX_H" to protect head file
over loading?
+#define PCS_HAS_PINCONF         (1 << 0)
+
+/**
+ * struct pcs_soc - SoC specific interface to pinctrl-single
+ * @data:      SoC specific data pointer
+ * @flags:     mask of PCS_HAS_xxx values
+ */
+struct pcs_soc {
+       void *data;
+       unsigned flags;
+};
+
+extern int pinctrl_single_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
+                               const struct pcs_soc *soc);
+extern int pinctrl_single_remove(struct platform_device *pdev);
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help