On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 08:38:19PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 01:05:42PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:15:32PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:

quoted

The patch above should already be queued in next/dt right ?

Indeed.

Then why the latest patch of your patchset got in 3.10, while the
patches actually fixing the DT it would have impacted were delayed to
3.11?

(And why was it merged so late in the development cycle?)

This. So now we have to scramble because some device trees will
produce warnings at boot.

Russell, the alternative is to revert Lorenzo's patch for 3.10 (and
re-introduce it for 3.11). Do you have a preference?

Sorry but I really don't understand what all the fuss in this thread
is about.

This thread seems to be saying that two development patches were
merged, which were 7762/1 and 7763/1, and that 7764/1 is a fix?
Are you sure about that, because that's not how they're described,
and not how they look either.

As Olof's warning downgrade is being merged (thanks for that and apologies for
failing to explain patches dependencies properly and stable related issues),
7764/1 won't apply cleanly anymore. Can you please drop it from the patch
system, I will update it and test it first thing tomorrow and send a
final version to the patch system.

Thank you very much,
Lorenzo