Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 2 authors, 2013-07-04

[PATCH v2 2/6] misc: sram: add ability to mark sram sections as reserved

From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stübner)
Date: 2013-06-26 09:19:17
Also in: linux-devicetree, lkml

Hi Philipp,

Am Dienstag, 25. Juni 2013, 12:17:05 schrieb Philipp Zabel:
Hi Heiko,

Am Dienstag, den 25.06.2013, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Heiko St?bner:
quoted
Some SoCs need parts of their sram for special purposes. So while being
part of the periphal, it should not be part of the genpool controlling
the sram.

Threfore add an option mmio-sram-reserved to keep arbitary portions of
the sram from being part of the pool.

Suggested-by: Rob Herring <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt |    8 +++
 drivers/misc/sram.c                             |   86
 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6
 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt index 4d0a00e..eae080e
100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/sram.txt
@@ -8,9 +8,17 @@ Required properties:
 - reg : SRAM iomem address range

+Optional properties:
+
+- mmio-sram-reserved: ordered list of reserved chunks inside the sram
that +  should not become part of the genalloc pool.
+  Format is <base size>, <base size>, ...; with base being relative to
the +  reg property base.
+
the keyword to reserve blocks of ram is /memreserve/ - should this
property name be aligned with that?
The mmio-sram-reserved name was suggested by Rob Herring, who I suppose has 
some slight experience with devicetree :-) .

I wasn't able to find real documentation on /memreserve/ but it looks more 
like it's used to reserve generic memregions, not being node-specific.
So reusing this might also cause confusion when the reserve-data now is 
relative to it's node reg.

quoted
 Example:
 
 sram: sram at 5c000000 {
 
 	compatible = "mmio-sram";
 	reg = <0x5c000000 0x40000>; /* 256 KiB SRAM at address 0x5c000000 */

+	mmio-sram-reserved = <0x0 0x100>; /* reserve 0x5c000000-0x5c000100 */

 };
diff --git a/drivers/misc/sram.c b/drivers/misc/sram.c
index afe66571..5fccbe3 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sram.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sram.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

 	struct sram_dev *sram;
 	struct resource *res;
 	unsigned long size;

+	const __be32 *reserved_list = NULL;
+	int reserved_size = 0;

 	int ret;
 	
 	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
@@ -65,12 +67,89 @@ static int sram_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

 	if (!sram->pool)
 	
 		return -ENOMEM;

-	ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool, (unsigned long)virt_base,
-				res->start, size, -1);
-	if (ret < 0) {
-		if (sram->clk)
-			clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
-		return ret;
+	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		reserved_list = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
+						"mmio-sram-reserved",
+						&reserved_size);
+		if (reserved_list) {
+			reserved_size /= sizeof(*reserved_list);
+			if (!reserved_size || reserved_size % 2) {
+				dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "wrong number of arguments in
mmio-sram-reserved\n"); +				reserved_list = NULL;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (!reserved_list) {
+		ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool, (unsigned long)virt_base,
+					res->start, size, -1);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			if (sram->clk)
+				clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
+			return ret;
+		}
Moving the clk_prepare_enable() further down would allow to avoid the
clk_disable_unprepare() in every error path,
quoted
+	} else {
+		unsigned int cur_start = 0;
+		unsigned int cur_size;
+		unsigned int rstart;
+		unsigned int rsize;
+		int i;
+
+		for (i = 0; i < reserved_size; i += 2) {
+			/* get the next reserved block */
+			rstart = be32_to_cpu(*reserved_list++);
+			rsize = be32_to_cpu(*reserved_list++);
+
+			/* catch unsorted list entries */
+			if (rstart < cur_start) {
+				dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unsorted reserved list (0x%x before 
current
quoted
0x%x)\n", +					rstart, cur_start);
+				if (sram->clk)
+					clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
like here
quoted
+				return -EINVAL;
+			}
+
+			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "found reserved block 0x%x-0x%x\n",
+				 rstart, rstart + rsize);
+
+			/* current start is in a reserved block */
+			if (rstart <= cur_start) {
+				cur_start = rstart + rsize;
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			/*
+			 * allocate the space between the current starting
+			 * address and the following reserved block
+			 */
+			cur_size = rstart - cur_start;
+
+			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%x-0x%x\n",
+				 cur_start, cur_start + cur_size);
+			ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool,
+					(unsigned long)virt_base + cur_start,
+					res->start + cur_start, cur_size, -1);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				if (sram->clk)
+					clk_disable_unprepare(sram->clk);
and here.
quoted
+				return ret;
+			}
+
+			/* next allocation after this reserved block */
+			cur_start = rstart + rsize;
+		}
+
+		/* allocate the space after the last reserved block */
+		if (cur_start < size) {
+			cur_size = size - cur_start;
+
+			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%x-0x%x\n",
+				 cur_start, cur_start + cur_size);
+			ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool,
+					(unsigned long)virt_base + cur_start,
+					res->start + cur_start, cur_size, -1);
+		}
+

 	}
 	
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sram);
Also, I think you could reduce the duplication of gen_pool_add_virt()
function calls, somehow like this:

	unsigned int cur_start = 0;
	unsigned int cur_size;
	unsigned int rstart;
	unsigned int rsize;
	int i = 0;

	if (!reserved_list)
		reserved_size = 0;

	for (i = 0; i < (reserved_size + 2); i += 2) {
		if (i < reserved_size) {
			/* get the next reserved block */
			rstart = be32_to_cpu(*reserved_list++);
			rsize = be32_to_cpu(*reserved_list++);

			/* catch unsorted list entries */
			if (rstart < cur_start) {
				dev_err(&pdev->dev,
					"unsorted reserved list (0x%x before current 0x%x)\n",
					rstart, cur_start);
				return -EINVAL;
			}

			dev_dbg(&pdev->dev,
				"found reserved block 0x%x-0x%x\n",
				rstart, rstart + rsize);
		} else {
			/* the last chunk extends to the end of the region */
			rstart = size;
		}

		/* current start is in a reserved block */
		if (rstart <= cur_start) {
			cur_start = rstart + rsize;
			continue;
		}

		/*
		 * allocate the space between the current starting
		 * address and the following reserved block, or the
		 * end of the region.
		 */
		cur_size = rstart - cur_start;

		dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "adding chunk 0x%x-0x%x\n",
			cur_start, cur_start + cur_size);
		ret = gen_pool_add_virt(sram->pool,
				(unsigned long)virt_base + cur_start,
				res->start + cur_start, cur_size, -1);
		if (ret < 0)
			return ret;
	}
yep, this looks nicer - same for moving the clk_prepare_enable to below this 
loop to unclutter the error-path.

So I will incorporate this in v3.


Thanks
Heiko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help