Thread (39 messages) flat view 39 messages, 4 authors, 2013-06-24

[PATCH v7 1/9] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework

From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-24 06:38:17
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml

On Wednesday 19 June 2013 02:52 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi Kishon,

I've noticed there is a little inconsistency between the code and documentation.

On 06/13/2013 10:43 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
quoted
+3. Creating the PHY
+
+The PHY driver should create the PHY in order for other peripheral controllers
+to make use of it. The PHY framework provides 2 APIs to create the PHY.
+
+struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, int id, const struct phy_ops *ops,
+    void *priv);
+struct phy *devm_phy_create(struct device *dev, int id,
+    const struct phy_ops *ops, void *priv);
The 'label' argument is missing in those function prototypes. It seems the
labels must be unique, I guess this needs to be documented. And do we allow
NULL labels ? If so, then there is probably a check for NULL label needed
in phy_lookup() and if not, then phy_create() should fail when NULL label
is passed ?
Yeah. Label is used only for non-dt case so NULL should be allowed while 
phy_create().

Thanks
Kishon
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help