[PATCHv7 01/11] clockevents: Prefer CPU local devices over global devices
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2013-06-19 16:30:47
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, lkml
Thomas, On 06/18, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 07:39:50PM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:quoted
On 06/13, Thomas Gleixner wrote:quoted
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:quoted
I prefer Thomas to have a look at it and ack it. I changed Cc to To for Thomas.The patch does not apply on tip timers/core. The code has been reworked a month ago. Please work against tip timers/core. That's where this stuff ends up.Ah, I thought your patch series had stalled. Here is a refreshed patch. Every other patch in this series applies cleanly to tip timers/core so I don't want to resend them again unless absolutely necessary. -----8<----- Subject: [PATCH v8] clockevents: Prefer CPU local devices over global devices On an SMP system with only one global clockevent and a dummy clockevent per CPU we run into problems. We want the dummy clockevents to be registered as the per CPU tick devices, but we can only achieve that if we register the dummy clockevents before the global clockevent or if we artificially inflate the rating of the dummy clockevents to be higher than the rating of the global clockevent. Failure to do so leads to boot hangs when the dummy timers are registered on all other CPUs besides the CPU that accepted the global clockevent as its tick device and there is no broadcast timer to poke the dummy devices. If we're registering multiple clockevents and one clockevent is global and the other is local to a particular CPU we should choose to use the local clockevent regardless of the rating of the device. This way, if the clockevent is a dummy it will take the tick device duty as long as there isn't a higher rated tick device and any global clockevent will be bumped out into broadcast mode, fixing the problem described above. Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: John Stultz <redacted> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <redacted> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <redacted>I've just tested this atop of tip/timers/core on a tc2, using only the sp804. As previously, without the patch boot hangs, and with the patch I'm able to reach userspace and do useful things. Tested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Thanks for working on this, Stephen.
Can you pick up the first two patches in this series please? And preferably make a stable branch that can be pulled into arm-soc? Then I can send the rest through the arm-soc tree. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation