On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 05:40:19PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:52:40AM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:

 [...] 

Can you update the comment describing swp entries too please? I *think* the
__SWP_* defines can remain untouched, but the comment is now wrong.

Will

Ta Will, I've now changed the other comment.
The __SWP_* entries look ok to me. I'm going to run some swap tests though
to see if anything crops up.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve