Thread (19 messages) 19 messages, 3 authors, 2013-05-02

[RFC PATCH 5/9] ARM64: mm: Add support for flushing huge pages.

From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2013-05-01 11:31:53
Also in: linux-arch, linux-mm

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 12:05:34PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Steve,

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:30:44PM +0100, Steve Capper wrote:
quoted
The code to flush the dcache of a dirty page, __flush_dcache_page,
will only flush the head of a HugeTLB/THP page.

This patch adjusts __flush_dcache_page such that the order of the
compound page is used to determine the size of area to flush.

Signed-off-by: Steve Capper <redacted>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/flush.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
index 88611c3..71c182d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/flush.c
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ void copy_to_user_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct page *page,
 
 void __flush_dcache_page(struct page *page)
 {
-	__flush_dcache_area(page_address(page), PAGE_SIZE);
+	size_t page_size = PAGE_SIZE << compound_order(page);
+	__flush_dcache_area(page_address(page), page_size);
 }
This penalises flush_dcache_page, while it might only be required for
__sync_icache_dcache (called when installing executable ptes).

Now, the job of flush_dcache_page is to deal with D-side aliases between
concurrent user and kernel mappings. On arm64, D-side aliasing is not a
problem so in theory flush_dcache_page could be a nop (well, a clear_bit,
but close enough).

The reason that flush_dcache_page *isn't* currently a nop, is because we
have harvard caches, so if we end up in a situation where the kernel is
writing executable text to a page which is also mapped into userspace (i.e.
there won't be a subsequent call to set_pte), then the user will execute
junk if we don't flush/invalidate things here.

This might be overkill. I can't think of a scenario where the above is true,
but I'm no mm expert, so it would be great if somebody else could chime in
to confirm/rubbish out suspicions...
And looking at the powerpc implementation, flush_dcache_page just does
clear_bit(PG_arch_1) and they haven't seen any problems. I'm pretty sure
we can to the same on arm64 (and 32-bit ARMv7 where we don't have
D-cache aliasing). But let's see the mm guys have a better insight here.

-- 
Catalin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help