On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:23:21PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:05:40PM -0700, S?ren Brinkmann wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 05:00:48PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 04:57:58PM -0700, Soren Brinkmann wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <redacted>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC: Jiri Slaby <redacted>
CC: linux-serial at vger.kernel.org

Why would you need/want to do this?

I often come across duplicated includes. Having some kind of order helps
avoiding that, imho.

We have a tool to handle duplicated includes, no need to put them in
sorted order for them to be detected.

During conflict resolution, I find it easier when there is some order.
Anyway, consider it dropped.

	S?ren