[PATCH 07/10] ASoC: phycore-ac97: Add DT support
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2013-03-12 18:59:22
Also in:
alsa-devel, linux-devicetree
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 07:33:08PM +0100, Markus Pargmann wrote:
Add devicetree support for this audio soc fabric driver. Signed-off-by: Markus Pargmann <redacted> --- sound/soc/fsl/phycore-ac97.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
A binding document is mandatory for new bindings.
+#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_IMX27_DT + .cpu_dai_name = "10010000.ssi", + .platform_name = "imx-fiq-pcm-audio", +#else
This looks wrong, at least the CPU DAI name should be being looked up via the DT.
+static const struct of_device_id imx_phycore_ac97_of_dev_id[] = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "phytec,imx27-pca100-ac97",
+ .data = (void *)MX27_PCA100,
+ }, {
+ .compatible = "phytec,imx27-pcm043-ac97",
+ .data = (void *)MX27_PCM043
+ }, {
+ /* sentinel */
+ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_phycore_ac97_of_dev_id);It seems like we ought to be able to describe the properties of the boards in this class rather than just enumerating the boards. What are the differences?
MODULE_AUTHOR("Sascha Hauer [off-list ref]");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PhyCORE ALSA SoC driver");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRV_NAME ": PhyCORE ALSA SoC fabric driver");Please don't make up terms like "fabric driver". -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130312/a164cce8/attachment.sig>