Thread (12 messages) 12 messages, 3 authors, 2013-03-21

[PATCH v3 1/2] i.MX27: Add clock support for SAHARA2.

From: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au (Herbert Xu)
Date: 2013-03-10 08:34:01
Also in: linux-crypto, linux-devicetree

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:48:19AM +0100, javier Martin wrote:
Hi Sascha,

On 4 March 2013 08:53, Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:37:52PM +0100, Javier Martin wrote:
quoted
Signed-off-by: Javier Martin <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
index 4c1d1e4..0b9664a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c
@@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref)
      clk_register_clkdev(clk[nfc_baud_gate], NULL, "imx27-nand.0");
      clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_baud_gate], "per", "coda-imx27.0");
      clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_ahb_gate], "ahb", "coda-imx27.0");
+     clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ahb_gate], "ahb", "sahara-imx27.0");
+     clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ipg_gate], "ipg", "sahara-imx27.0");
One of the first patches I want to push upstream for the next merge
window is this one:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1817741/

So the change above becomes unnecessary
Very good. Then this patch can be safely dropped.
So should I take this patch or not?

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help