[PATCH v3 1/2] i.MX27: Add clock support for SAHARA2.
From: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au (Herbert Xu)
Date: 2013-03-10 08:34:01
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-devicetree
From: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au (Herbert Xu)
Date: 2013-03-10 08:34:01
Also in:
linux-crypto, linux-devicetree
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 08:48:19AM +0100, javier Martin wrote:
Hi Sascha, On 4 March 2013 08:53, Sascha Hauer [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 12:37:52PM +0100, Javier Martin wrote:quoted
Signed-off-by: Javier Martin <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c index 4c1d1e4..0b9664a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-imx27.c@@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ int __init mx27_clocks_init(unsigned long fref) clk_register_clkdev(clk[nfc_baud_gate], NULL, "imx27-nand.0"); clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_baud_gate], "per", "coda-imx27.0"); clk_register_clkdev(clk[vpu_ahb_gate], "ahb", "coda-imx27.0"); + clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ahb_gate], "ahb", "sahara-imx27.0"); + clk_register_clkdev(clk[sahara_ipg_gate], "ipg", "sahara-imx27.0");One of the first patches I want to push upstream for the next merge window is this one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1817741/ So the change above becomes unnecessaryVery good. Then this patch can be safely dropped.
So should I take this patch or not? Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu [off-list ref] Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt