On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

On 02/27/2013 01:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:

quoted

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:40:51PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

quoted

On 02/27/2013 01:31 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:27:07PM +0100, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:

quoted

In patch "5d3c28b usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library"
devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle() was added. It uses try_module_get() to lock the
phy driver in memory. The corresponding module_put() is missing in that patch.

This patch adds try_module_get() to usb_get_phy() and usb_get_phy_dev().
Further the missing module_put() is added to usb_put_phy().

Reviewed-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <redacted>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Grzeschik <redacted>

this one doesn't apply to my tree. What did you use as a base ?

As stated in the cover letter: Greg's usb-next.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git

I'd really appreciate if this series goes into a single tree. So that
other chipidea developers can base their work on this.

it eventually will all go through Greg's queue, but drivers/usb/phy and
drivers/usb/otg/ needs to go through my tree so we avoid conflicts
later, sorry.

Oh - this is going to be complicated. I'll rip the series into 3 parts
and repost.

let's try like this:

drivers/usb/otg and drivers/usb/phy which don't create dependencies for
chipidea and other patches which create dependencies.

Then we can figure out how to handle the dependencies.

-- 
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130227/e6aafe85/attachment.sig>