On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:09:00AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Hi Simon
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 02:36:24PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 06:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
quoted
Z and ZG clocks on sh73a0 have pll0 as their parent, not pll1.
Thanks I have applied this to the soc5 branch and thus queued it up for v3.10.
Please let me know if you would prefer me to push it as a fix for v3.9.
And in that vein, if you regard it as -stable material.
Thanks.
Perhaps other people disagree, but I recommend not being so trigger
happy with -stable unless it will potentially give us some upside.
AFAIK there is no in-tree consumer of this clock anyway, so involving
-stable without further testing seems like a lot of hassle with no
real benefit.
If there is no in-tree consumer then it is not v3.9 or -stable material.
Just to confirm, that I'm not aware of any current consumers of these
clocks, so, no rush with stable.
Thanks. I'll leave it queued up for 3.10.