On 02/11/2013 08:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:

On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

* Alan Stern [off-list ref] [130117 07:19]:

quoted

On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:

quoted

Let's have a single platform data structure for the OMAP's High-Speed
USB host subsystem instead of having 3 separate ones i.e. one for
board data, one for USB Host (UHH) module and one for USB-TLL module.

This makes the code much simpler and avoids creating multiple copies of
platform data.

CC: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <redacted>

For the ehci-omap.c part:

Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>

If Samuel acks this patch, I can apply just this patch alone on v3.8-rc3
into an immutable branch omap-for-v3.9/board-usb so we all merge it in
as needed.

So, that didn't happen; Samuel applied it from the mailing list and
sfr just hit merge conflicts due to it.

Sigh.

This patch (touching arch/arm/mach-omap2) didn't have acks from Tony either.

Oops, this is my bad :(. Should have flagged Samuel about it. Will be more careful
next time.

Samuel, Tony, can you sort this out with a stable short topic branch
as Tony suggested? It'd be nice to avoid the merge conflict by a
little coordination here. :(

cheers,
-roger