[PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: SoC name and revision unification
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2013-02-06 19:19:31
Also in:
linux-omap, lkml
Hi, * Ruslan Bilovol [off-list ref] [130206 11:03]:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This is a long story where for each new generation of OMAP we used different approaches for creating strings for SoCs names and revisions that this patch fixes. It makes future exporting of this information to SoC infrastructure easier. Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <redacted> --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c index 8a68f1e..b16a432 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c@@ -31,8 +31,11 @@ #define OMAP4_SILICON_TYPE_STANDARD 0x01 #define OMAP4_SILICON_TYPE_PERFORMANCE 0x02 +#define OMAP_SOC_MAX_NAME_LENGTH 16 + static unsigned int omap_revision; -static const char *cpu_rev; +static char soc_name[OMAP_SOC_MAX_NAME_LENGTH]; +static char soc_rev[OMAP_SOC_MAX_NAME_LENGTH]; u32 omap_features; unsigned int omap_rev(void)
Sorry I was not clear earlier with what I meant, but if you remove static const char *cpu_rev here and use soc_name and soc_rev here..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -181,8 +187,7 @@ void __init omap2xxx_check_revision(void) static void __init omap3_cpuinfo(void) { - const char *cpu_name; - + const char *omap3_soc_name; /* * OMAP3430 and OMAP3530 are assumed to be same. *
..then no need to replace cpu_name with omap3_soc_name here?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -191,28 +196,30 @@ static void __init omap3_cpuinfo(void) * and CPU class bits. */ if (cpu_is_omap3630()) { - cpu_name = "OMAP3630"; + omap3_soc_name = "OMAP3630"; } else if (soc_is_am35xx()) { - cpu_name = (omap3_has_sgx()) ? "AM3517" : "AM3505"; + omap3_soc_name = (omap3_has_sgx()) ? "AM3517" : "AM3505"; } else if (cpu_is_ti816x()) { - cpu_name = "TI816X"; + omap3_soc_name = "TI816X"; } else if (soc_is_am335x()) { - cpu_name = "AM335X"; + omap3_soc_name = "AM335X";
... Or here?
void __init omap3xxx_check_revision(void)
{
+ const char *omap3_soc_rev;
u32 cpuid, idcode;
u16 hawkeye;
u8 rev;Then here if you just make it a local cpu_rev..
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -303,7 +311,7 @@ void __init omap3xxx_check_revision(void) cpuid = read_cpuid(CPUID_ID); if ((((cpuid >> 4) & 0xfff) == 0xc08) && ((cpuid & 0xf) == 0x0)) { omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES1_0; - cpu_rev = "1.0"; + omap3_soc_rev = "ES1.0"; return; }@@ -324,26 +332,26 @@ void __init omap3xxx_check_revision(void) case 0: /* Take care of early samples */ case 1: omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES2_0; - cpu_rev = "2.0"; + omap3_soc_rev = "ES2.0"; break; case 2: omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES2_1; - cpu_rev = "2.1"; + omap3_soc_rev = "ES2.1"; break; case 3: omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES3_0; - cpu_rev = "3.0"; + omap3_soc_rev = "ES3.0"; break; case 4: omap_revision = OMAP3430_REV_ES3_1; - cpu_rev = "3.1"; + omap3_soc_rev = "ES3.1"; break;
..no need to replace cpu_rev with omap3_soc_rev all over the place? Regards, Tony