On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 05:54:54PM +0100, Matthieu CASTET wrote:

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
index 57cae1f..dcb650f 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c

@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
 #include <linux/usb/gadget.h>
 #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
 #include <linux/usb/chipidea.h>
+#include <linux/usb/of.h>
+#include <linux/phy.h>
 
 #include "ci.h"
 #include "udc.h"

@@ -211,6 +213,42 @@ static int hw_device_init(struct ci13xxx *ci, void __iomem *base)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void hw_phymode_configure(struct ci13xxx *ci)
+{
+	u32 portsc;
+
+	/*
+	 * The lpm version has the corresponding bits in the devlc register.
+	 * Currently not implemented.
+	 */
+	if (ci->hw_bank.lpm)
+		return;

Why you don't implement it ?

If you don't implement it, I believe you should add a warning in order to catch
it when used with lpm devices.

I'm against adding a warning because current users seem to go well
without this setting. Adding a warning would lead to more confusion than
it would help.

I could try and implement it, though I'm unsure about the register
layout.

What I know from an earlier post from you is this:

#define LPM_PTS(d)  (((d)>>29)&7)
#define LPM_STS     BIT(28) /* serial transceiver select */
#define LPM_PTW     BIT(27) /* parallel transceiver width */

Do you also know how LPM_PTS is decoded?

Sascha


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |