[RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernels
From: 이경식 <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-30 04:03:31
-----Original Message----- From: David Sterba [mailto:dsterba at suse.cz] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 7:55 AM To: Kyungsik Lee Cc: Russell King; Thomas Gleixner; Ingo Molnar; H. Peter Anvin; Michal Marek; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-kbuild at vger.kernel.org; x86 at kernel.org; Nitin Gupta; Richard Purdie; Josh Triplett; Joe Millenbach; Andrew Morton; Albin Tonnerre; hyojun.im at lge.com; chan.jeong at lge.com; gunho.lee at lge.com; minchan.kim at lge.com; namhyung.kim at lge.com; raphael.andy.lee at gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernels On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 02:50:43PM +0900, Kyungsik Lee wrote:quoted
This patchset is for supporting LZ4 compressed kernel and initial ramdisk on the x86 and ARM architectures.Have you considered the 'high compression' mode of lz4? http://code.google.com/p/lz4/source/browse/trunk/lz4hc.c
Yes, The high compression mode of lz4 is set as default in the submitted patch. The figure shows: Uncompressed size: 13MB lz4: Normal compression mode output size: 8.1MB (62.7%) decompression time: 232ms(148ms, with enabled unaligned memory access) lz4: High compression mode output size: 6.8MB (52.3%) decompression time: 251ms(167ms) The size of output in NC(Normal Compression) is bigger than HC(High Compression) But decompression in NC is a bit faster than HC in ARM based board. I assume that
The compression format remains the same, the compressor tries harder (but is slower), resulting compression ratio is better. an examle compression for vmlinux.bin of x86_64 build: input size: 16509520 bytes lz4 (svn 88): output size: 6393684 (38.7%) compression time: 41.7 ms (395 MB/s) decompression time: 13.7 ms (1204 MB/s) lz4hc (svn 88): output size: 5319137 (32.2%) compression time: 683 ms (24 MB/s) decompression time: 13.1 ms (1259 MB/s) compressed file delta: 6393684 - 5319137 = 1074547 ~ 1MB tested on a Nehalem box; same test on my slow desktop gives lz4: compression time: 97 ms (169 MB/s) decompression time: 25.7 ms (643 MB/s) lz4hc: compression time: 1386 ms (11 MB/s) decompression time: 26 ms (619 MB/s) While the decompression time is almost the same, image size is smaller. The kernel image compression is run in userspace and the low speed is not much of concern for a one-time operation. For the reference, lzo (current kernel version) run on the destktop: output size: 6026256 (36.5%) decompression time: 79.6 ms (207 MB/s)quoted
It seems that it?s worth trying LZ4 compressed kernel image or ramdisk for making the kernel boot more faster.There's another potential user of lz4: btrfs. I've submitted a feature preview integrating lz4 compression http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/15744 and we have tried to integrate the HC mode as well http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/18165 . So far it's on a slow track, conceptually it works, but I the code needs some work so it could live under lib/* (we've used the svn sources with minor changes, no kernel coding style). It would be easier for me to enhance the existing lib/lz4/* codebase. Also zram could consider lz4, I'm not sure if there are other potential users. david