Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2013-01-21

[GIT PULL] ste_dma40 updates for 3.9

From: Olof Johansson <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-15 06:48:15

Hi,

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Fabio Baltieri
[off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Arnd, Olof,

This contains a series of updates and fixes for the ste_dma40 driver.

The driver is specific for the ux500, and the patches were acked by both Linus
Walleij, and Vinod Koul (dmaengine), who agreed to push this through arm-soc.

Can you please pull those in for -next?
While I don't mind taking this through arm-soc, I don't see a strong
reason to do so?

This series of patches only modify the ste_dma40 driver, there are no
corresponding changes under arch/arm that need to be coordinated or
considered w.r.t. merge conflicts. I.e. they all seem nicely isolated
to only the driver.

So is there a specific reason for why these shouldn't just go in
through the dmaengine tree?


Thanks,

-Olof
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help