[PATCH 5/6 v14] gpio: Add device tree support to block GPIO API
From: Roland Stigge <hidden>
Date: 2013-01-27 14:32:55
Also in:
lkml
On 27/01/13 14:07, Stijn Devriendt wrote:
quoted
+Example: + + blockgpio { + compatible = "linux,gpio-block"; + + block0 { + gpios = <&gpio 3 0 0>, + <&gpio 3 1 0>; + }; + block1 { + gpios = <&gpio 4 1 0>, + <&gpio 4 3 0>, + <&gpio 4 2 0>, + <&gpio 4 4 0>, + <&gpio 4 5 0>, + <&gpio 4 6 0>, + <&gpio 4 7 0>, + <&gpio 4 8 0>, + <&gpio 4 9 0>, + <&gpio 4 10 0>, + <&gpio 4 19 0>; + }; + };How do you see bindings for other kinds of drivers? In my patchset, it's possible for other drivers to use gpio-blocks. One example we have is a power sequencer with 2 pins attached to GPIO pins. These 2 pins form a 2bit word to select power margining. These 2 pins need to be set synchronously (as otherwise when going from profile 0 to profile 3 you pass either profile 1 or profile 2 which could be bad for hardware) In the device-tree this is specified as: powr at 0x20 { // other properties gpios = <&gpio 4 0 &gpio 5 0>; }; Is this kind of integration also possible?
You can reference the gpio block via a phandle, e.g.:
blockgpio {
compatible = "linux,gpio-block";
selector1 {
gpios = <&gpio 4 0>,
<&gpio 5 0>;
};
};
powr at 0x20 {
// ...
gpios = <&selector1>;
};
In the driver, you can get the gpio block like this:
block = gpio_block_find_by_name(of_parse_phandle(powr, "gpios", 0)->name);
(Simplified by removed error/NULL handling!)
If this turns out to be a common pattern, I can add a convenience "get"
function for this.
Roland